Difference between revisions of "Test Point Testing in C/C++"

From STRIDE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Instrumenting the Test Code)
(Instrumenting the Test Code)
Line 61: Line 61:
 
</source>
 
</source>
  
 +
== Reference ==
  
=== Specifying the Expectation Set ===
+
=== Expectation Set ===
 
An expectation set is an array of '''srTestPointExpect_t''' structures. srTestPointExpect_t is typdef'd as follows:
 
An expectation set is an array of '''srTestPointExpect_t''' structures. srTestPointExpect_t is typdef'd as follows:
  
Line 76: Line 77:
 
} srTestPointExpect_t;
 
} srTestPointExpect_t;
 
</source>
 
</source>
 
==== Basic Example ====
 
A typical declaration of an expectation set looks like this:
 
<source lang='c'>
 
    srTestPointExpect_t expected[]= {
 
        {"START"},
 
        {"ACTIVE"},
 
        {"IDLE"},
 
        {"END"},
 
        {0}};
 
</source>
 
 
This example specifies the expectation of one hit each of the test points "START", "ACTIVE", "IDLE", and "END".
 
  
 
A few things to note:
 
A few things to note:
* The end of the array is marked by a srTestPointExpect_t set to all zero values
+
* The end of the array has to be marked by a srTestPointExpect_t set to all zero values
* Structure members we omit in the array declaration are set to 0 by the compiler
+
* The ''count'' and ''data'' members could be omit in the array declaration (they will be automatically set to 0 by the compiler)
* A count value of either 0 or 1 is interpreted as 1  
+
* A ''count'' value of either 0 or 1 is interpreted as 1  
* A data value 0 indicates that there is no payload data associated with this test point
+
* A ''data'' value 0 indicates that there is no payload data associated with this test point
  
=== Registering the Expectation Set ===
+
=== srTestPointExpect ===
To register an expectation set, we call '''srTestPointExpect()''' and receive a handle to identify the expectation set in the previous step.
+
The srTestPointExpect() routine is used to register an expecttaion set.
  
The registration looks like this:
+
<source lang="c">
<source lang='c'>
+
srBOOL srTestPointExpect(srTestPointExpect_t* ptExpected, srTestPointExpectOrder_e eOrder, srTestPointExpectMembership_e eMembership, srWORD* pwHandle)
srWORD handle;
 
srTestPointExpect(expected, srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_UNORDERED, srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_NONEXCLUSIVE, &handle);
 
 
</source>
 
</source>
 +
 +
{| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="align:left;" 
 +
| '''Parameters'''
 +
| '''Type'''
 +
| '''Description'''
 +
|-
 +
| ptExpected
 +
| Input
 +
| Pointer to an expectaion set.
 +
|-
 +
| eOrder
 +
| Input
 +
| Expectation order. Posible values are: <br/>
 +
srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_ORDERED - the test points are expected to be hit exactly in the defined order <br/>
 +
srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_UNORDERED - the test points could to be hit in any order
 +
|-
 +
| eMembership
 +
| Input
 +
| Expectation membership. Posible values are: <br/>
 +
srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_EXCLUSIVE - any non expected test point hit will be treated as an error <br/>
 +
srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_UNORDERED - non expected test points hit are ignored
 +
|}
 +
<br>
 +
{| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="align:left;"
 +
| '''Return Value'''
 +
| ''' Description'''
 +
|-
 +
| srOK
 +
| Success
 +
|-
 +
| srERR
 +
| Null string passed in.
 +
|-
 +
| srTEST_ERR_HANDLE_INVALID
 +
| Invalid handle passed in.
 +
|-
 +
| srTEST_WARN_STR_TRUNCATED
 +
| String passed in was too large and was truncated.
 +
|}
  
 
This example specifies that the order of expectations is not important (srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_UNORDERED) and the membership of expectations is not exclusive (srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_NONEXCLUSIVE).
 
This example specifies that the order of expectations is not important (srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_UNORDERED) and the membership of expectations is not exclusive (srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_NONEXCLUSIVE).

Revision as of 18:16, 3 June 2009

Introduction

Test Points provide an easy-to-use framework for solving a class of common yet difficult unit testing problems:

How can I observe and verify activity that occurs in another thread?

A couple of common scenarios that become a lot more testable via test points include:

  • Verification of State machine operation
  • Verification of communication drivers


Instrumenting Target Code

Target threads are instrumented simply by placing lines of the following form into the source code:

...
/* a test point with no payload */
srTEST_POINT("first test point");

srTEST_POINT_DATA("second test point", "string payload");

srTEST_POINT_DATA1("third test point", "payload with format string %d", myVar);

When this code is executed it broadcasts a message via the STRIDE runtime which is detected by the test (IM) thread if it is currently looking for test points (i.e. in a srTEST_POINT_WAIT()). We refer to this as a test point hit.

Instrumenting the Test Code

The test code is instrumented using these steps:

  1. Specify an expectation set (i.e. the test points that are expected to be hit)
  2. Register the expectation set with the STRIDE runtime
  3. Wait for the expectation set to be satisfied or a timeout to occur

Here is an example:

#include <srtest.h>

void tf_testpoint_wait(void)
{
  /* specify expectation set */
  srTestPointExpect_t expected[]= {
        {"START"}, 
        {"ACTIVE"}, 
        {"IDLE"},
        {"END"}, 
        {0}};

  /* register the expectation set with the STRIDE */
  srWORD handle;
  srTestPointExpect(expected, srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_UNORDERED, srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_NONEXCLUSIVE, &handle);

  /* start your asynchronous operation */
  ...

  /* wait for expectaion set to be satisfied or a timeout to occur */
  srTEST_POINT_WAIT(handle, 1000);
}

#ifdef _SCL
#pragma scl_test_flist(“testfunc”, tf_testpoint_wait)
#endif

Reference

Expectation Set

An expectation set is an array of srTestPointExpect_t structures. srTestPointExpect_t is typdef'd as follows:

typedef struct
{
    /* the label value is considered the test point's identity */
    const srCHAR *  label;
    /* count specifies the number of times the test point is expected to be hit */ 
    srDWORD         count;
    /* data specifies an optional string data payload */
    const srCHAR *  data;
} srTestPointExpect_t;

A few things to note:

  • The end of the array has to be marked by a srTestPointExpect_t set to all zero values
  • The count and data members could be omit in the array declaration (they will be automatically set to 0 by the compiler)
  • A count value of either 0 or 1 is interpreted as 1
  • A data value 0 indicates that there is no payload data associated with this test point

srTestPointExpect

The srTestPointExpect() routine is used to register an expecttaion set.

srBOOL srTestPointExpect(srTestPointExpect_t* ptExpected, srTestPointExpectOrder_e eOrder, srTestPointExpectMembership_e eMembership, srWORD* pwHandle)
Parameters Type Description
ptExpected Input Pointer to an expectaion set.
eOrder Input Expectation order. Posible values are:

srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_ORDERED - the test points are expected to be hit exactly in the defined order
srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_UNORDERED - the test points could to be hit in any order

eMembership Input Expectation membership. Posible values are:

srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_EXCLUSIVE - any non expected test point hit will be treated as an error
srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_UNORDERED - non expected test points hit are ignored


Return Value Description
srOK Success
srERR Null string passed in.
srTEST_ERR_HANDLE_INVALID Invalid handle passed in.
srTEST_WARN_STR_TRUNCATED String passed in was too large and was truncated.

This example specifies that the order of expectations is not important (srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_UNORDERED) and the membership of expectations is not exclusive (srTEST_POINT_EXPECT_NONEXCLUSIVE).

Once the expectation set is registered, any test point hits are buffered and will be available to the subsequent srTEST_POINT_WAIT(). If the activity we will be obvserving/verifying needs to be started (e.g. a state machine gets kicked off) this should be done after srTestPointExpect().

Waiting for the Expectation Set to be Satisfied

The final step is to wait for the expectation to be satisfied. We do this using the srTEST_POINT_WAIT() macro as shown below.

srTEST_POINT_WAIT(handle, expect_flags, timeout);

The macro takes three arguments:

srTEST_POINT_WAIT() arguments
Argument Description
handle The handle returned from the call to srTestPointExpect() used to register the expectation set
expect_flags Value that customizes the expectation in terms of test point hit order and test point exclusivity (see below)
timeout Timeout value in milliseconds; 0 means infinite timeout

The action the macro takes is as follows:

  • The test thread (the thread macro is executed on) blocks until either the expectation set is satisfied or the timeout elpases. (Be careful with a timeout of 0, this can hang the test thread waiting for an expectation.)
  • All test points hit during the wait (both expected and unexpected) are added to the test report as testcase comments
  • If an unexpected test point is encountered (either out of order or not in the expectation set), or the timeout period elapses before the expectation set is satisfied the current test immediately fails
  • Once the wait is over (whether the expectation set has been satisfied or there has been a test failure), the current expectation set is automatically unregistered from the STRIDE runtime and the handle is released

Expect Flags

The following table shows the effect on expectations using different expect_flag values.

Expect Flags Unexpected Test Point
causes test failure
Out of order Test Point
causes failure
0
srTEST_POINT_WAIT_ORDER X
srTEST_POINT_WAIT_STRICT X
srTEST_POINT_WAIT_ORDER | srTEST_POINT_WAIT_STRICT X X